Talk:Belarusians

Belarus Top‑importance

	Belarus portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belarus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belarus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelarusWikipedia:WikiProject BelarusTemplate:WikiProject BelarusBelarus
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Russia: Demographics & ethnography Top‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the demographics and ethnography of Russia task force.

Ethnic groups Top‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Category: People from Belarus

The related Category:People from Belarus has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page.

Proposed deletion of Category:Slavic countries and territories

It is currently being proposed that Category:Slavic countries and territories be deleted. This article is related to that category. The relevant discussion is located at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 January 8#Countries and territories by language family. The discussion would benefit from input from editors with a knowledge of and interest in Belarusians. Krakkos (talk) 11:17, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Transliteration of proper Belarusian texts

5.197.251.205, I would like to clarify the transliteration system you are using. The transliteration system you are using is used solely for narrowly targeted purposes. In particular, exclusively for the transfer of geographic Belarusian names located in Belarus.--Modun (talk) 02:55, 1 October 2021 (UTC) [http://gki.gov.by/uploads/files/new%20structure/napravleniya/geodezia%20i%20kartografia/39_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%20%D0%93%D0%9A%D0%98_23.10.2000_%E2%84%96%2015.doc ПОСТАНОВЛЕНИЕ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОГО КОМИТЕТА ПО ЗЕМЕЛЬНЫМ РЕСУРСАМ, ГЕОДЕЗИИ И КАРТОГРАФИИ РЕСПУБЛИКИ БЕЛАРУСЬ от 23 ноября 2000 г. № 15 "ОБ УТВЕРЖДЕНИИ ИНСТРУКЦИИ ПО ТРАНСЛИТЕРАЦИИ ГЕОГРАФИЧЕСКИХ НАЗВАНИЙ РЕСПУБЛИКИ БЕЛАРУСЬ БУКВАМИ ЛАТИНСКОГО АЛФАВИТА"][reply]

I have explained countless times none of the systems of romanization of Belarusian use ł. Please read the romanization of the Belarusian article on Wikipedia.Lacinka is not an official form of language and its use is very limited. 5.197.251.205 (talk) 10:51, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

recent edit caused many referencing errors

@Cukrakalnis: your recent edit caused several referencing errors. I've made speculative fixes for them, but I'm not able to verify all the referenes and changes you made to the content. Are you able to do this yourself? Otherwise, I think the material should simply be reverted since it wasn't properly referenced. -- Mikeblas (talk) 16:06, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have verified each and every one of them, thank you for informing me about this. Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:11, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Litvini and Belarus

According to Chronicle of Bihovets Italian nobles and Italian ans Slavic 500 families traveled during Nero time found empty land and founded Lituania they used Latin language till 15 century then start speak Belarusian an Polish. After Mongol destroy Rus they occupy part of Rus and that become Rus White or Lituaniq and grow into Grand Duchy of Lituania Александр Макович (talk) 03:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We cannot cite old (often unreliable) chronicles to make such claims. Please see WP:PRIMARY and WP:RS for further information. Mellk (talk) 09:31, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I took names from Chronicles and used there coat of arms that were written in chronicle and able to trace them till now . Poland and Lithuania changed a bit there coat of arms and call it by natives of them, yes part of them become Polish but there roots Italian Александр Макович (talk) 02:19, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]